Environmental Law

Environmental Law

Our environmental lawyers provide commercially focussed advice on environmental law (including water and waste law) issues in Western Australia.


Landowners and occupiers have certain water law rights to control and use water resources located on, below or adjoining their land. At common law, “riparian” water rights grant to a landowner the right to reasonable use of water flowing on or adjoining their land. This common law right to water also extends to use of static groundwater and surface water on the land.

The landowner’s common law rights to water still exist and are still relevant, but have become limited by statute-based water control and management laws. In Western Australia, the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA) (the Act) governs a WA landowner’s rights in water resources on or adjoining their land.

A landowner or occupier has, subject to any restrictions in the Act, a right to take surface water or water from waterways on or adjoining their land for the following purposes:

  1. domestic use;
  2. watering stock; or
  3. irrigation of small gardens.

In Western Australia, the vesting of rights to water in the Crown, subject to local by-laws and the Act, does not prevent a landowner or occupier of land from:

1.     draining the land;

2.     making any dam or tank on the land, not on a watercourse or wetland, provided it does not:

a)     diminish the flow of water in a watercourse or the amount of water in a wetland; or

b)     significantly adversely affect the quality of water or any ecosystem in a watercourse or a wetland.

We can assist you to understand water law, including the impact and operation of water legislation and regulation upon your water rights and dealing with the Department of Water in relation to licences to take water from bores. We can provide you with commercial and practical advice on this complex and increasingly important area of the law.

A related issue is the limitation on the right to develop land which may constitute a wetland (see our Planning & Development section).


They say one person’s trash (waste) is another person’s treasure, but what properly falls within the current concept of ‘waste’ and how can something be properly classified as ‘waste’? These are difficult concepts for the legislature and courts to grapple with. What is considered to be waste has evolved over time and has become recognised as a transitional and ever-changing concept.

Environmental legislation and regulation in each state and territory in Australia contains different definitions of the term ‘waste’. One common element of each definition is that waste is a substance that is “discharged” or “discarded” including matter whether “useful” or “useless”. But can one person’s waste stop being waste in the hands of another? Recent case law has gone both ways on this question, illustrating the complexity of the topic.

Each state and territory in Australia has strict regulatory mechanisms controlling the release of waste into the environment, whether by way of licences, permits, authorisations or otherwise. These regulations may appear to be aimed at protecting the environment from pollution but are also driven by the twin objectives of revenue raising and encouraging re-processing of discarded material rather than dumping it. But if a particular substance is not waste, should the disposal or release of it rightfully require a licence, permit or authorisation? The curious interplay between the Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Legislative regime and the Environmental Protection Act in Western Australia is a matter currently being considered by the courts.

Our environmental lawyers have experience in dealing with issues and complex disputes involving Australian environmental legislation and regulation, including the waste regime in Western Australia. We can assist you in determining whether or not particular environmental regulatory mechanisms apply to you and your business.

A helpful tip: if your business engages in environmental protection activities the capital and revenue expenditure it incurs can be tax deductible. If you need assistance concerning any tax issues/objections, including relating to whether an activity can be considered to fall within the definition of “environmental protection activities”, our environmental lawyers are ready to assist.

Subscribe to our e-newsletter

To send or not to send

16th October 2017

Direct Marketing under Australian Privacy and Spamming Laws Before you hit send on that commercial electronic message (including, amongst others, emails and SMS messages) (“CEM”) you should be aware of the application of Australian privacy and spam laws. Finding electronic addresses online or purchasing a list from a business to business list supplier (“B2B List... read more

Employers caught by own policies

14th September 2017

Businesses, particularly large ones, often develop internal policies concerning the employment of their employees. These policies deal with a wide range of matters including the use of motor vehicles, drugs and alcohol, conflicts of interest, IT and social media, confidentiality and intellectual property, dress codes, bullying, harassment and anti-discrimination, redundancy entitlements and eligibility for share... read more


17th July 2017

What is a caveat? A caveat is a notice recorded on a title to land to protect an interest that affects that title.  The caveat forbids registration of any further interests that may affect the interest recorded in the caveat without the consent of the caveator (the person who lodges the caveat). Each state and... read more